Continuing bonds - part 2.
Once upon a time psychotherapists truly believed that the task of grieving was a severing; they believed, despite all evidence to the contrary, that the faster we ignore any memories of our lost loved ones - the faster we will recover. The work of grieving was understood in terms of energy, that the energy we had invested in the beloved now flowed into the grave with them. And, the more we remembered, the more we felt the loss.
Put bluntly, in the older psychodynamic model - the dead provide us with no energy - and as our energy cannot be reciprocated by the dead, we should move on, let go, or risk depression.
I cannot for a second, agree with this!
In the book, Continuing Bonds (1994) an example is given of psychotherapy at its most heart rending brutal worst. The concept that a refusal to let go of the loved one is a symptom of psychopathology justified a show of strength and resolution by a therapist as he metaphorically performed Chod, on a sixteen year old girl's mother.
Chod is the Tibetan ritual of cutting up the dead for the birds and dogs of the charnel ground. As wood was in short supply cremation was reserved for only the most revered Lamas, and as the ground was often frozen, grave digging would have been back breaking work - Chod was the preferred method; a dismembering of the corpse performed by men with knives, to return the elements of the dead back to the world...
The choice of this therapist to do this in words and images, to talk in this way to a bereaved girl, breaks my heart.
Instead of talking with her about her mother as a dead person, her mother was referred to as an inanimate object consisting of degenerating anotomic structures such as skin, muscle, and bone. Such an attempt, after the phase of abreaction, serves to hasten the actual return to normal reality testing...(Volkan and Showalter, 1968. p.370)
The concepts underpinning this brutality had been described by Freud. So, no doubt the therapist who prepared himself to turn a beloved mother into a heap of muscle and bone, meant well.
Freud theorized that grief is different from depression in that he thought depression is caused by internalizing the parent. Grief, as Freud saw it, frees the ego from the attachment to the deceased (Continuing Bonds.p.5)
This concept - of the internalised parent as the cause of depression - lives on, to some extent in transactional analysis. And so, to go back to that awful, crucifying, session, after the therapist had learnt of my feelings for him - there is this snippet of dialogue:
Comments
Post a Comment